Rating: I’m just not sure what to think about this movie. It was very much the same and yet vastly different from the 1971 Gene Wilder version. I think I’m going to have to read the book (which I did in the 7th grade for a play, but seem to remember nothing about it) to see which one is closer.
Others have written wonderful and detailed reviews, so I’m not even going to attempt it. If you’ve seen the 1971 version (who HASN’T!?) then you might be shocked by the following changes:
There are definitely more changes, one other huge one in particular that I won’t go into.
I’m still not sure how I feel about this movie. All the individual parts - scenery, acting, directing, music, etc - were wonderful in and of themselves. Putting them all together though.. something just didn’t seem right about it all. I think it was a lot closer to the 1971 movie than I was expecting and therefore I felt bored through most of it.
27% (4)
27% (4)
20% (3)
20% (3)
7% (1)My name is Lynda, I'm 26 and live near Atlanta, GA. After six years of keeping a random blog, I decided to concentrate solely on media related crap flowing through my brain. I consume a lot of media.
Page rendered in 0.3147 seconds with 49 queries.